B R I E F I N G S on Becoming a Warren. Bennis Leader. BY KEVIN CASHMAN. IN R. E. V. IE. W. IN oUr WorK WiTH LEAdErS, no one has had a more profound. From: “On becoming a leader” Warren Bennis. Published by Random Century. ISBN Summarised by Andrew Gibbons. Downloaded free from. The manager administers; the leader innovates. • The manager is a copy; the leader is an original. • The manager maintains; the leader.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Japanese|
|ePub File Size:||23.85 MB|
|PDF File Size:||16.68 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Sign up for free]|
ON BECOMING. A LEADER. By Warren Bennis. THE SUMMARY IN BRIEF. This summary examines the evolutionary process by which managers become lead-. CONFLICT MANAGEMENT Becoming a Conflict Competent Leader . More praise for On Becoming a Leader “This is Warren Bennis's most important book. scretch.info 12/2/08 PM Page i More praise for On Becoming a Leader “Warren Bennis—master practitioner, researcher, and .
Skip to main content. Log In Sign Up. Alfian Rizkianto. No topic is more important; no more able and caring person has attacked it. Bennis has masterfully peeled the onion to reveal the heartseed of leadership. Read it and reap.
You Can Learn Anything P. The first was a need to know Personal growth. Modes of Learning P. Practical accomplishment. AI would add a component to that. Reflecting on Experience P. Stagnation 8. What is it about you that you have always known as yourself? What are you conscious of in yourself: Zhivago P. Identity Confusion 6. Yu in others. Guild 4. What this means is that here and now. Inferiority 5. Adolescence Identity vs.. All too often. Leaders are self-directed.
And now listen carefully. In other words. However far back you go in your memory it is always some external manifestation of yourself where you come across your identity: Stagnation 7. Early Childhood Autonomy vs. But leaders are selfdirected. Old age Integrity vs. Infancy Basic trust vs. School Age Industry vs. Young Adulthood Intimacy vs. Basic Mistrust 2. Life Stages of Erikson Pp. Play Age Initiative vs. Doubt 3. Unexamined Life Pp. Doubt Will or compulsion 3. Despair Wisdom or disdain Chemistry and Circumstance P.
Autonomy vs. Integrity vs. Guild Purpose or inhibition 4. Trust vs.. Identity vs. Inferiority Competence or inertia 5. Stagnation Care or rejectivity 8. That is why true learning begins with unlearning. And who knows what they might have done if they had chosen to follow their dreams?
In the world according to Erikson.
Generativity vs. Identity Confusion Fidelity or repudiation 6. Intimacy vs. What distinguishes the leader from everyone else is that he takes all of that and makes himself.
Initiative vs. In this way.. Stagnation Love or exclusivity 7. Like oarsmen. Unlike everyone else. Industry vs.
Mistrust Hope or withdrawal 2. True Self P. They must be learned. Teaching P. Type of Experiences P. Human Gap P. These experiences include broad and continuing education. The more we know about ourselves and our world. Jean Piaget said. You become cause and effect rather than mere effect. AEvery time we teach a child something. Knowing The World P.
Learning vs. In making what the authors of the Club of Rome report call Athe shift from.. Innovative learning is a way of realizing vision. Maintenance Learning. If you learn to anticipate the future and shape events rather than being shaped by them you will benefit in significant ways. It allows us to change the way things are. Being limited and finite.
Innovative Learning Pp.. Shock Learning keeps us in line and obedient. This can be used in the Gen Ed Page.. It is a dialogue that begins with curiosity and is fueled by knowledge. General Education P. It is inclusive. It requires us to adjust to things as they are. We call it a human gap because it is a dichotomy between a growing complexity of our own making and a lagging development of our capacities. In innovative learning. You learn from them. We also were alike in wanting to work very hard.
Trusting the Impulse P. Mentors P. Sometimes trusting the impulse leads directly to brilliance. They not only believe in the necessity of mistakes. Groups and Friends Pp. A lot of it came out of the bonding of our values. Learning from Adversity Pp. The essence of creativity is not the possession of some special talent. Friends P. In organizations where mistakes are not allowed. But sometimes they make history. American organizational life is a left-brain culture.
How do you seize the opportunity? First you must use your instincts to sense it.
Reflection of Self P. Bottom-line thinking is a manifestation of left-brain dominance. One of the reasons that so few corporate executives have successfully made the leap from capable manager to successful leader is that the corporate culture.
It is the individual. Our culture needs more right-brain qualities. In any corporation. Habits are born in the left brain and unmade in the right. Learning from Experience Pp. Which is exactly the moment when you should do it. But true reflection inspires. AOne of the biggest mistakes a person can make is to put together a team that reflects only him.
If you wait for a giant mistake before you reflect. For example, Sidney Harman mobilized employees around a radical new management approach—amid a factory crisis. A distinctive, compelling voice. With words alone, college president Jack Coleman preempted a violent clash between the football team and anti-Vietnam War demonstrators threatening to burn the American flag. Lower the flag, wash it, then put it back up. Adaptive capacity. This most critical skill includes the ability to grasp context, and hardiness.
Grasping context requires weighing many factors e. Hardiness provides the perseverance and toughness needed to remain hopeful despite disaster. For instance, Michael Klein made millions in real estate during his teens, lost it all by age 20—then built several more businesses, including transforming a tiny software company into a Hewlett-Packard acquisition.
As lifelong students of leadership, we are fascinated with the notion of what makes a leader. Why is it that certain people seem to naturally inspire confidence, loyalty, and hard work, while others who may have just as much vision and smarts stumble, again and again?
But we have come to believe it has something to do with the different ways that people deal with adversity. Put another way, the skills required to conquer adversity and emerge stronger and more committed than ever are the same ones that make for extraordinary leaders. The skills required to conquer adversity and emerge stronger and more committed than ever are the same ones that make for extraordinary leaders. Take Sidney Harman. Thirty-four years ago, the thenyear-old businessman was holding down two executive positions.
He was the chief executive of Harman Kardon now Harman International , the audio components company he had cofounded, and he was serving as president of Friends World College, now Friends World Program, an experimental Quaker school on Long Island whose essential philosophy is that students, not their teachers, are responsible for their education.
The men on the night shift were supposed to get a coffee break at 10 pm. The buzzer works for me. I got me a watch. Further, he created an environment where dissent was not only tolerated but also encouraged.
Harman had, unexpectedly, become a pioneer of participative management, a movement that continues to influence the shape of workplaces around the world. He had connected two seemingly unrelated ideas and created a radically different approach to management that recognized both the economic and humane benefits of a more collegial workplace. Harman went on to accomplish far more during his career.
In addition to founding Harman International, he served as the deputy secretary of commerce under Jimmy Carter. But he always looked back on the incident in Bolivar as the formative event in his professional life, the moment he came into his own as a leader. In interviewing more than 40 top leaders in business and the public sector over the past three years, we were surprised to find that all of them—young and old—were able to point to intense, often traumatic, always unplanned experiences that had transformed them and had become the sources of their distinctive leadership abilities.
For the leaders we interviewed, the crucible experience was a trial and a test, a point of deep self-reflection that forced them to question who they were and what mattered to them. It required them to examine their values, question their assumptions, hone their judgment. And, invariably, they emerged from the crucible stronger and more sure of themselves and their purpose—changed in some fundamental way. Leadership crucibles can take many forms. Some are violent, life-threatening events.
Others are more prosaic episodes of self-doubt. As we studied these stories, we found that they not only told us how individual leaders are shaped but also pointed to some characteristics that seem common to all leaders—characteristics that were formed, or at least exposed, in the crucible. Learning From Difference A crucible is, by definition, a transformative experience through which an individual comes to a new or an altered sense of identity.
It is perhaps not surprising then that one of the most common types of crucibles we documented involves the experience of prejudice. Being a victim of prejudice is particularly traumatic because it forces an individual to confront a distorted picture of him- or herself, and it often unleashes profound feelings of anger, bewilderment, and even withdrawal.
For all its trauma, however, the experience of prejudice is for some a clarifying event. Through it, they gain a clearer vision of who they are, the role they play, and their place in the world. Consider, for example, Liz Altman, now a Motorola vice president, who was transformed by the year she spent at a Sony camcorder factory in rural Japan, where she faced both estrangement and sexism.
But on her very first morning, when the bell rang for a coffee break, the men headed in one direction and the women in another—and the women saved her a place at their table, while the men ignored her. Instinct told Altman to ignore the warning rather than insult the women by rebuffing their invitation. Over the next few days, she continued to join the women during breaks, a choice that gave her a comfortable haven from which to observe the unfamiliar office culture.
Finally, after paying close attention to the conversations around her, she learned that several of the men were interested in mountain biking. They embrace risks and mistakes, learning from adversity.
They reflect on all of their experiences. With these skills, they inspire others to follow them. Bennis falls into the one mistake he accuses American managers of making: he takes a poll of successful leaders and then gets caught in short-term thinking to address its results.
As a result, this pessimistic analysis of American business is dated today. However, getAbstract. Read this if you want to lead - and be good at it. He has served as a consultant for multinational corporations and governments around the world.